![Should we now explain to UK couples who plan a family that stopping at two children, or at least having one less than first intended, is the simplest and biggest contribution anyone Should we now explain to UK couples who plan a family that stopping at two children, or at least having one less than first intended, is the simplest and biggest contribution anyone](https://www.quotemaster.org/images/q/11294/1129427/i1.png)
Should we now explain to UK couples who plan a family that stopping at two children, or at least having one less than first intended, is the simplest and biggest contribution anyone
![John Guillebaud Quote: “Should we now explain to UK couples who plan a family that stopping at two children, or at least having one less than fi...” John Guillebaud Quote: “Should we now explain to UK couples who plan a family that stopping at two children, or at least having one less than fi...”](https://quotefancy.com/media/wallpaper/3840x2160/6056134-John-Guillebaud-Quote-Should-we-now-explain-to-UK-couples-who-plan.jpg)
John Guillebaud Quote: “Should we now explain to UK couples who plan a family that stopping at two children, or at least having one less than fi...”
![SOLVED:Part 4 of 5 (d) Would it be unusual if the sample mean were less than $7800? Round answer to at least four decimal places_ It (Choose one) 87800 is unusual because SOLVED:Part 4 of 5 (d) Would it be unusual if the sample mean were less than $7800? Round answer to at least four decimal places_ It (Choose one) 87800 is unusual because](https://cdn.numerade.com/ask_images/38873a4d08004d5fbb96ec189e08e3eb.jpg)